Rolyan wrote: Many learner drivers accept that they have something to learn.
Right up until they pass their test
Rolyan wrote: Many learner drivers accept that they have something to learn.
jont- wrote:Rolyan wrote: Many learner drivers accept that they have something to learn.
Right up until they pass their test
Rolyan wrote:Those things that are going to get you are close, but at one point were not close. So by spotting/anticipating them early enough, you can plan to deal with them before they get close enough to get you.
I know that you know that, and I know that you know that I know that you know it...
(and much more good sense besides)
Rolyan wrote: I know that you know that, and I know that you know that I know that you know it,
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner wrote: having near-misses which seemed to have happened . . . that couldn't be covered in formal driving instruction .
Horse wrote:Mr Cholmondeley-Warner wrote: having near-misses which seemed to have happened . . . that couldn't be covered in formal driving instruction .
HP goes some way towards that.
Horse wrote:Intriguingly, learners get 'safer' (at least, have fewer reported crashes) as they continue on driving solo, so they do seem to improve, learn. The challenge is whether 'that' learning can be incorporated into 'L' training and testing (because if it isn't tested then it's unlikely to be trained)?
Horse wrote:Rolyan wrote: I know that you know that, and I know that you know that I know that you know it,
I'm glad someone does
Intriguingly, learners get 'safer' (at least, have fewer reported crashes) as they continue on driving solo, so they do seem to improve, learn. The challenge is whether 'that' learning can be incorporated into 'L' training and testing (because if it isn't tested then it's unlikely to be trained)?
Coincidentally:
http://www.roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/6168.html
Return to “Advanced Driving - Cars”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests