Stefluc1 wrote: It seems you are against extending /offsiding
It seems I'm either not writing clearly or you're reading in an expectation of certain content.
e.g.:
Horse wrote: The A832 example I would happily use the full width
Horse wrote:Stefluc1 wrote: . . . the view is only restricted from a near side approach so by extending straddle the centre line on the approach gives you equal distance for safety
If you're saying 'move away from potential danger, or position equidistant from danger from either side', then 'yes'
Stefluc1 wrote: but please don’t try and stop anyone else doing it as we are all responsible for our own actions when we get we behind the wheel as everything we do when we drive is a calculated risk some more than others.
It seems I'm either not writing clearly or you're reading in an expectation of certain content.
e.g.
Horse wrote: However, as with most things, if you are clear about the circumstances when it should be used, what you might gain and the risks should it go wrong, the fair enough. If it's not easy to state clearly and concisely answers to the first two questions, then perhaps it needs more consideration.
What I'm against - and the need for IAM or RoSPA to actually publish any guidance on offsiding supports that view - is that uninformed, unthinking, unnecessary, implementation of offsiding is a high risk activity.