hir wrote:GTR1400MAN wrote:RiK wrote:And just to add insult to injury, the IAM have come out in full support of this on Facebook...
... Why am I working as an Observer for you and paying to be a member when you come out with rubbish like this?
I share your pain. But I have a way of mitigating the frustration, irritation and exasperation.
I do not regard myself, and never have, as "working for the IAM". I have always regarded myself as "working for the associate". So, as far as I'm concerned, the IAM is simply a means to an end in supplying me with a steady stream of members of the general public who wish to improve their driving skills. I'm more than happy to help those individuals and they're always grateful for the help and guidance I am able to offer. In that way I've managed to create a disconnect between myself and the silliness, which enables me to retain my sanity. This approach also helps to keep my blood pressure under control.
Just a thought.
Completely agree with all you say John.
Possibly, with only one exception, all our Group Observers are also of the same opinion. In fact since setting up our Group some 40 years ago it has been our aim to provide the best training we can. We, therefore, train beyond the basic requirements to pass the test. To help, support and encourage an Associate to recognise and achieve their driving potential. To instil a desire for continuous improvement and make driving a fun experience rather than a necessary chore. The test itself is of minor importance and like you we create a disconnect between ourselves and the "silliness", which may not be the view the IAM would like us to have.