Tesla X?

Anything that doesn't fit elsewhere - doesn't have to be AD related.
sussex2
Posts: 732
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:43 am

Re: Tesla X?

Postby sussex2 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:58 pm

What happens five years down the line when the batteries pack up?

User avatar
akirk
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:58 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Tesla X?

Postby akirk » Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:29 pm

sussex2 wrote:What happens five years down the line when the batteries pack up?


It is the equivalent of a car's engine blowing up every 5 years on schedule - but probably more expensive :)

I suspect that long term car sales might move to leased cars and then the cost will be built in

Alasdair

IcedKiwi
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:06 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Tesla X?

Postby IcedKiwi » Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:44 pm

In California, the Air Resource Board says that to sell hybrids/electric vehicles the manufacturer has to provide a 10year, 150k warranty! Obviously they'll only be offering that warranty where the law dictates and can't help but feel that it's a bit of a loss leader

waremark
Posts: 898
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:23 am

Re: Tesla X?

Postby waremark » Tue Dec 08, 2015 1:30 am

There has been a battery powered self launching glider on the market since 2004. I believe they claimed a battery life of 11 years, to maintain 80% of original capacity. Wikipedia tells me they claim a battery life of 20 years or 3,000 cycles. I have not heard of complaints about batteries needing premature replacement, which is not to say that it hasn't occurred. By the way, in this application, by comparison with the more common 2 stroke propulsion system for self launching gliders, the battery powered version is heavier, more expensive, and has an endurance equivalent to a petrol engine with only 5 litres of fuel on board, whereas typically (for lower take-off weight than the battery version) you would have a capacity of maybe 40 litres. On the other hand the battery version is quiet, clean, simple to operate, and providing they get the electronics right should be more reliable.

TheInsanity1234
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:03 pm

Re: Tesla X?

Postby TheInsanity1234 » Tue Dec 08, 2015 6:45 pm

I've always thought the best kind of hybrid would be a fully electric car which has a small, but very efficient petrol engine in it which is connected to a generator that generates some electricity to give some extra range when necessary.

ETA: Although, having said that, perhaps, the smaller the engine, the more difficult it is to maintain a high thermal efficiency, due to the surface area : volume ratio that's much smaller for bigger volumes...

Using that logic, a 4.0l I4 engine would be easier to gain higher thermal efficiency than a smaller one, but the bigger you make the cylinders, the heavier the pistons will be, so the more energy is wasted in having to move the piston...

User avatar
jont-
Posts: 1523
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:12 am
Location: Herefordshire

Re: Tesla X?

Postby jont- » Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:11 pm

TheInsanity1234 wrote:I've always thought the best kind of hybrid would be a fully electric car which has a small, but very efficient petrol engine in it which is connected to a generator that generates some electricity to give some extra range when necessary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisker_Karma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_i3#Ra ... der_option
arguably the i3s is too small to be properly useful.

IcedKiwi
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:06 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Tesla X?

Postby IcedKiwi » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:34 pm

The concept Audi a1 REEV (range extended EV) had a little wankel, then there's the CX-75 which originally had a couple of mini gas turbines to power some high speed electric motors!

As jont mentioned some are just designed as a get you home type device and not designed to be used for long periods and aren't powerful enough to give you max performance if the battery's empty.

User avatar
StressedDave
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:27 am

Re: Tesla X?

Postby StressedDave » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:59 pm

IIRC, and this is going back mumble something years to my final year at Imperial when I helped with the integration of a small gas-turbine and high-speed alternator into a city car, the killer problem was the amount of NOx coming out of the tailpipe. I think the guys at Williams stepped on that particular conceit quite quickly for the CX-75. Even a tiny gas turbine has a huge mass flow rate to convert into nitrous oxides.

When I last looked, there was a lot of research going on into the design of range extender ICEs, particularly on the construction side with monolithic block and cylinder heads. If anyone has seen the size of the Porsche LMP1 engine, you'll see where the technology is going.
All posts are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Do what you like with it, just don't make money off it.


Return to “General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests