Page 1 of 2

Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 9:26 am
by vanman

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:17 am
by angus
Shame they weren't full of concrete....

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:17 pm
by martine
I wonder why the cameras didn't pick up the barrels?

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:19 pm
by kfae8959
Or perhaps it did pick up the barrels, but if it only did so once it was committed past the heavy, hitting them was its best option?

David

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 5:40 pm
by jont-
kfae8959 wrote:Or perhaps it did pick up the barrels, but if it only did so once it was committed past the heavy, hitting them was its best option?

David

Needs to learn to look further ahead then :roll:

(whenever I've seen demos of ADAS video systems it's always bothered me that the cameras don't identify things very far from the vehicle they are in - even on the crappy resolution systems used, I can usually see stuff it's not identifying).

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 8:33 pm
by kfae8959
My point exactly. If that was what went wrong!

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:42 am
by Horse
jont- wrote:
kfae8959 wrote:Or perhaps it did pick up the barrels, but if it only did so once it was committed past the heavy, hitting them was its best option?

David

Needs to learn to look further ahead then :roll:

(whenever I've seen demos of ADAS video systems it's always bothered me that the cameras don't identify things very far from the vehicle they are in - even on the crappy resolution systems used, I can usually see stuff it's not identifying).


I don't know what systems exactly are fitted to that car, or what they are supposed to achieve.

However, my understanding is that the braking systems on many vehicles will only work on static objects up to about 20mph and to support adaptive cruise control.

For higher speed braking, they might apply the brakes to reduce impact speed only.

Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:43 pm
by RiK
Here's the original video for those who haven't seen it..


Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:43 pm
by RiK
martine wrote:I wonder why the cameras didn't pick up the barrels?


Here's another video on Youtube showing the Tesla entirely fails to see those big barrels...


Re: Latest bit of idiocy

Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:09 pm
by Pyrolol
Tesla's aren't fitted with LIDAR and rely on radar and cameras to see distant objects as I understand it. I believe stationary objects are filtered out of the radar results because there are too many false positives, so you end up with a system that can't really see things that aren't moving.